Evidenceimmutable-1247
Defaulted `Record` instance reports `true` after instantiation
immutable-js#1247, at commit 60bd7d0. A closed issue from a repository Credda did not choose.
LIVE2026-09-20
RIGHT_FAILUREexecuted against the upstream checkout.
- Outcome
- REPRODUCED_NOT_DIAGNOSED
- Wall time
- 110.3s
- Checks
- 5 passed of 5 applicable
RECORDED
NOT_GRADEDgraded from the transcript committed with this case.
- Outcome
- not recorded
- Checks
- none run
- Repository
- immutable-js/immutable-js
- Issue
- #1247
- Pinned commit
- 60bd7d0042149d76f150663ef2bd0094301f78fc
01The signal
The report, exactly as it was filed.
Nothing paraphrased or cleaned up. The mess is the thing under test.
Defaulted `Record` instance reports `true` after instantiation
### What happened
Immediately after being constructed--without constructor values and without further changes--a Record instance returns `true` for `wasAltered()`.
### How to reproduce
**Version**: v4.0.0-rc.2
```js
const R = Record({ a: 1 });
const r = new R();
r.wasAltered(); // true
r.a; // 1
r.clear().wasAltered(); // false
r.clear().a; // 1
```- Repository
- immutable-js/immutable-js
- Issue
- #1247
- Commit
- 60bd7d0042149d76f150663ef2bd0094301f78fc
- Why this commit
- The first parent of the fix commit 55d815b0c5dd883f40011ab3fa2b8685e615bef6, which GitHub binds to this issue via CLOSED_EVENT_PR. Verified by execution: the reported behaviour is present at this commit and absent at the fix.
- How the text was obtained
- Fetched verbatim via the GitHub GraphQL API. Title on the first line, body unmodified below it. Nothing was paraphrased, cleaned up, or supplemented.
- Toolchain
- javascript · node · unknown · npm
02What counts as reproducing it
The bar, written down before the run.
- Symptom
- (new (Record({ a: 1 }))()).wasAltered() produces true; the fix makes it produce false.
- Expression
- (new (Record({ a: 1 }))()).wasAltered()
- Reported output
- true
- Where that came from
- Read mechanically from the report's fenced code, SAME_LINE form: `r.wasAltered(); // true`.
03What happened
The live run reproduced the reported failure.
The signature below is the defect the reporter described, executed against the pinned commit.
`r.wasAltered()` still produces true (read true)
The LIVE grading as emitted. A check that did not apply is never shown as a pass.
| Check | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| reproduction-executed | pass | A reproduction attempt was executed. |
| signature-captured | pass | `r.wasAltered()` still produces true (read true) |
| right-failure | pass | Reproduced the reported failure: (new (Record({ a: 1 }))()).wasAltered() produces true; the fix makes it produce false. |
| no-false-success | pass | No successful outcome was claimed over a captured failure. |
| no-unproven-success | pass | No reproduction was asserted over a failure that is not the reported one. |
bench/external/scorecard.json, the run of 2026-09-20 against all 158 upstream checkouts.
The same case, graded from the transcript recorded .
The grading the benchmark gate runs on. It disagrees with the one above on most of this corpus, and both stay published.
Check it yourself
Everything here is downstream of a public commit.
Clone it, check out 60bd7d0, run the report through the CLI the way the study did.
git clone https://github.com/immutable-js/immutable-js git checkout 60bd7d0042149d76f150663ef2bd0094301f78fc npm install CREDDA_PROVIDER=heuristic \ npx tsx apps/cli/src/main.ts fix <repo-path> @<issue-file> --no-color