Evidencejoi-121
Array is accepted as an Object type
joi#121, at commit a480742. A closed issue from a repository Credda did not choose.
LIVE2026-09-20
RIGHT_FAILUREexecuted against the upstream checkout.
- Outcome
- REPRODUCED_NOT_DIAGNOSED
- Wall time
- 42.9s
- Checks
- 5 passed of 5 applicable
RECORDED
NOT_GRADEDgraded from the transcript committed with this case.
- Outcome
- not recorded
- Checks
- none run
- Repository
- hapijs/joi
- Issue
- #121
- Pinned commit
- a4807429dae89b67c689ee98e73916785a9c6317
01The signal
The report, exactly as it was filed.
Nothing paraphrased or cleaned up. The mess is the thing under test.
Array is accepted as an Object type
``` Joi.validate([], Joi.types.Object()); // returns null Joi.validate([1, 3, 4], Joi.types.Object()); // returns null ```
- Repository
- hapijs/joi
- Issue
- #121
- Commit
- a4807429dae89b67c689ee98e73916785a9c6317
- Why this commit
- The first parent of the fix commit 2c59a463bbdf0c0b38119180cff119bfb42cb838, which GitHub binds to this issue via REFERENCED_COMMIT. Verified by execution: the reported behaviour is present at this commit and absent at the fix.
- How the text was obtained
- Fetched verbatim via the GitHub GraphQL API. Title on the first line, body unmodified below it. Nothing was paraphrased, cleaned up, or supplemented.
- Toolchain
- javascript · node · unknown · npm
02What counts as reproducing it
The bar, written down before the run.
- Symptom
- Joi.validate([], Joi.types.Object()) produces null; the fix makes it produce { [Error: the value of <root> must be an object] _errors: [ { message: 'the value of <root> must be an object', path: null } ], _object: [] }.
- Expression
- Joi.validate([], Joi.types.Object())
- Reported output
- null
- Where that came from
- Read mechanically from the report's fenced code, SAME_LINE form: `Joi.validate([], Joi.types.Object()); // returns null`.
03What happened
The live run reproduced the reported failure.
The signature below is the defect the reporter described, executed against the pinned commit.
`Joi.validate([], Joi.types.Object())` still produces null (read null)
The LIVE grading as emitted. A check that did not apply is never shown as a pass.
| Check | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| reproduction-executed | pass | A reproduction attempt was executed. |
| signature-captured | pass | `Joi.validate([], Joi.types.Object())` still produces null (read null) |
| right-failure | pass | Reproduced the reported failure: Joi.validate([], Joi.types.Object()) produces null; the fix makes it produce { [Error: the value of <root> must be an object] _errors: [ { message: 'the value of <root> must be an object', path: null } ], _object: [] }. |
| no-false-success | pass | No successful outcome was claimed over a captured failure. |
| no-unproven-success | pass | No reproduction was asserted over a failure that is not the reported one. |
bench/external/scorecard.json, the run of 2026-09-20 against all 158 upstream checkouts.
The same case, graded from the transcript recorded .
The grading the benchmark gate runs on. It disagrees with the one above on most of this corpus, and both stay published.
Check it yourself
Everything here is downstream of a public commit.
Clone it, check out a480742, run the report through the CLI the way the study did.
git clone https://github.com/hapijs/joi git checkout a4807429dae89b67c689ee98e73916785a9c6317 npm install CREDDA_PROVIDER=heuristic \ npx tsx apps/cli/src/main.ts fix <repo-path> @<issue-file> --no-color