Evidencejoi-121

Array is accepted as an Object type

joi#121, at commit a480742. A closed issue from a repository Credda did not choose.

LIVE2026-09-20

RIGHT_FAILURE

executed against the upstream checkout.

Outcome
REPRODUCED_NOT_DIAGNOSED
Wall time
42.9s
Checks
5 passed of 5 applicable

RECORDED

NOT_GRADED

graded from the transcript committed with this case.

Outcome
not recorded
Checks
none run
Repository
hapijs/joi
Issue
#121
Pinned commit
a4807429dae89b67c689ee98e73916785a9c6317

01The signal

The report, exactly as it was filed.

Nothing paraphrased or cleaned up. The mess is the thing under test.

joi#121 · as filedcommit a480742

Array is accepted as an Object type

```
Joi.validate([], Joi.types.Object()); // returns null
Joi.validate([1, 3, 4], Joi.types.Object()); // returns null
```
Repository
hapijs/joi
Issue
#121
Commit
a4807429dae89b67c689ee98e73916785a9c6317
Why this commit
The first parent of the fix commit 2c59a463bbdf0c0b38119180cff119bfb42cb838, which GitHub binds to this issue via REFERENCED_COMMIT. Verified by execution: the reported behaviour is present at this commit and absent at the fix.
How the text was obtained
Fetched verbatim via the GitHub GraphQL API. Title on the first line, body unmodified below it. Nothing was paraphrased, cleaned up, or supplemented.
Toolchain
javascript · node · unknown · npm

02What counts as reproducing it

The bar, written down before the run.

expected.reportedFailurecommitted with the case
Symptom
Joi.validate([], Joi.types.Object()) produces null; the fix makes it produce { [Error: the value of <root> must be an object] _errors: [ { message: 'the value of <root> must be an object', path: null } ], _object: [] }.
Expression
Joi.validate([], Joi.types.Object())
Reported output
null
Where that came from
Read mechanically from the report's fenced code, SAME_LINE form: `Joi.validate([], Joi.types.Object()); // returns null`.

03What happened

The live run reproduced the reported failure.

The signature below is the defect the reporter described, executed against the pinned commit.

captured failure signatureLIVE · normalized
`Joi.validate([], Joi.types.Object())` still produces null (read null)
bench external · checks · LIVE5 checks · 2026-09-20

The LIVE grading as emitted. A check that did not apply is never shown as a pass.

Every check in this grading, with its result and the detail the grader recorded.
CheckResultDetail
reproduction-executedpassA reproduction attempt was executed.
signature-capturedpass`Joi.validate([], Joi.types.Object())` still produces null (read null)
right-failurepassReproduced the reported failure: Joi.validate([], Joi.types.Object()) produces null; the fix makes it produce { [Error: the value of <root> must be an object] _errors: [ { message: 'the value of <root> must be an object', path: null } ], _object: [] }.
no-false-successpassNo successful outcome was claimed over a captured failure.
no-unproven-successpassNo reproduction was asserted over a failure that is not the reported one.

bench/external/scorecard.json, the run of 2026-09-20 against all 158 upstream checkouts.

The same case, graded from the transcript recorded .

The grading the benchmark gate runs on. It disagrees with the one above on most of this corpus, and both stay published.

Check it yourself

Everything here is downstream of a public commit.

Clone it, check out a480742, run the report through the CLI the way the study did.

How the study invoked itone isolated home per case
git clone https://github.com/hapijs/joi
git checkout a4807429dae89b67c689ee98e73916785a9c6317
npm install

CREDDA_PROVIDER=heuristic \
  npx tsx apps/cli/src/main.ts fix <repo-path> @<issue-file> --no-color