Evidencemathjs-291
Format with fixed notation not working for very large values
mathjs#291, at commit 97e452e. A closed issue from a repository Credda did not choose.
LIVE2026-09-20
RIGHT_FAILUREexecuted against the upstream checkout.
- Outcome
- REPRODUCED_NOT_DIAGNOSED
- Wall time
- 84.8s
- Checks
- 5 passed of 5 applicable
RECORDED
NOT_GRADEDgraded from the transcript committed with this case.
- Outcome
- not recorded
- Checks
- none run
- Repository
- josdejong/mathjs
- Issue
- #291
- Pinned commit
- 97e452e544c263a32acd1ef9684ff8047afe354c
01The signal
The report, exactly as it was filed.
Nothing paraphrased or cleaned up. The mess is the thing under test.
Format with fixed notation not working for very large values
``` js
var x = 1e+27;
console.log(math.format(x, {notation: 'fixed'}));
// output: "1e+27"
// expected: "1000000000000000000000000000"
console.log(math.format(x, {notation: 'auto', exponential: {lower: 1e-100, upper: 1e+100}}));
// output: "1e+27"
// expected: "1000000000000000000000000000"
```
This has to do with the 21 digit limit of JavaScripts [`toPrecision`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Number/toPrecision) function.
Would be nice to support fixed notation for very large values too.- Repository
- josdejong/mathjs
- Issue
- #291
- Commit
- 97e452e544c263a32acd1ef9684ff8047afe354c
- Why this commit
- The first parent of the fix commit 3b8eff0a7aa09a9cd3f3f8effc522aebb6d23f4c, which GitHub binds to this issue via CLOSED_EVENT_COMMIT. Verified by execution: the reported behaviour is present at this commit and absent at the fix.
- How the text was obtained
- Fetched verbatim via the GitHub GraphQL API. Title on the first line, body unmodified below it. Nothing was paraphrased, cleaned up, or supplemented.
- Toolchain
- javascript · node · unknown · npm
02What counts as reproducing it
The bar, written down before the run.
- Symptom
- math.format((1e+27), {notation: 'fixed'}) produces '1e+27'; the fix makes it produce '1000000000000000000000000000'.
- Expression
- math.format((1e+27), {notation: 'fixed'})
- Reported output
- "1e+27"
- Where that came from
- Read mechanically from the report's fenced code, NEXT_LINE form: `console.log(math.format(x, {notation: 'fixed'})); // output: "1e+27"`.
03What happened
The live run reproduced the reported failure.
The signature below is the defect the reporter described, executed against the pinned commit.
`math.format(x, {notation: 'fixed'})` still produces "1e+27" (read 1e+27)The LIVE grading as emitted. A check that did not apply is never shown as a pass.
| Check | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| reproduction-executed | pass | A reproduction attempt was executed. |
| signature-captured | pass | `math.format(x, {notation: 'fixed'})` still produces "1e+27" (read 1e+27) |
| right-failure | pass | Reproduced the reported failure: math.format((1e+27), {notation: 'fixed'}) produces '1e+27'; the fix makes it produce '1000000000000000000000000000'. |
| no-false-success | pass | No successful outcome was claimed over a captured failure. |
| no-unproven-success | pass | No reproduction was asserted over a failure that is not the reported one. |
bench/external/scorecard.json, the run of 2026-09-20 against all 158 upstream checkouts.
The same case, graded from the transcript recorded .
The grading the benchmark gate runs on. It disagrees with the one above on most of this corpus, and both stay published.
Check it yourself
Everything here is downstream of a public commit.
Clone it, check out 97e452e, run the report through the CLI the way the study did.
git clone https://github.com/josdejong/mathjs git checkout 97e452e544c263a32acd1ef9684ff8047afe354c npm install CREDDA_PROVIDER=heuristic \ npx tsx apps/cli/src/main.ts fix <repo-path> @<issue-file> --no-color