Evidencemoment-1290
Regression: moment("2013-11-21T10:10:56 Z").calendar(); => invalid date
moment#1290, at commit c9a56eb. A closed issue from a repository Credda did not choose.
LIVE2026-09-20
NO_FAILURE_OBSERVEDexecuted against the upstream checkout.
- Outcome
- NO_CHANGE_REQUIRED
- Wall time
- 71.6s
- Checks
- 3 passed of 5 applicable
RECORDED
NOT_GRADEDgraded from the transcript committed with this case.
- Outcome
- not recorded
- Checks
- none run
- Repository
- moment/moment
- Issue
- #1290
- Pinned commit
- c9a56ebf5434c2c7b66ae88519cdcfcfeacdf296
01The signal
The report, exactly as it was filed.
Nothing paraphrased or cleaned up. The mess is the thing under test.
Regression: moment("2013-11-21T10:10:56 Z").calendar(); => invalid date
// moment.js
// version : 1.7.2
> moment("2013-11-21T10:10:56 Z").calendar();
> < "Today at 11:10 AM"
// moment.js
// version : 2.4.0
> moment("2013-11-21T10:10:56 Z").calendar()
> < "Invalid date"- Repository
- moment/moment
- Issue
- #1290
- Commit
- c9a56ebf5434c2c7b66ae88519cdcfcfeacdf296
- Why this commit
- The first parent of the fix commit 2fb2fd08b2f5dd4ceac7b7800d2a613da6b41ab0, which GitHub binds to this issue via CROSS_REFERENCED_PR. Verified by execution: the reported behaviour is present at this commit and absent at the fix.
- How the text was obtained
- Fetched verbatim via the GitHub GraphQL API. Title on the first line, body unmodified below it. Nothing was paraphrased, cleaned up, or supplemented.
- Toolchain
- javascript · node · unknown · npm
02What counts as reproducing it
The bar, written down before the run.
- Symptom
- moment("2013-11-21T10:10:56 Z").calendar() produces 'Invalid date'; the fix makes it produce '11/21/2013'.
- Expression
- moment("2013-11-21T10:10:56 Z").calendar()
- Reported output
- "Invalid date"
- Where that came from
- Proposed by a model reading this report and nothing else -- it never saw the repository or the fix commit -- and read back as a claim by the same parser the harvest uses, SAME_LINE form: `moment("2013-11-21T10:10:56 Z").calendar() //=> "Invalid date"`. The report sat in the NO_FENCE_PROSE_ONLY bucket, which no regex reaches. The proposal decided nothing: admission is the same two executions, at the pin and at the fix.
03What happened
No failure was captured.
Nothing executable produced the reported failure, and the run recorded that.
The LIVE grading as emitted. A check that did not apply is never shown as a pass.
| Check | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| reproduction-executed | pass | A reproduction attempt was executed. |
| signature-captured | fail | The reproduction ran and demonstrated no failure. |
| right-failure | fail | Expected `moment("2013-11-21T10:10:56 Z").calendar()` still producing "Invalid date". |
| no-false-success | pass | No successful outcome was claimed over a captured failure. |
| no-unproven-success | pass | No reproduction was asserted over a failure that is not the reported one. |
bench/external/scorecard.json, the run of 2026-09-20 against all 158 upstream checkouts.
The same case, graded from the transcript recorded .
The grading the benchmark gate runs on. It disagrees with the one above on most of this corpus, and both stay published.
Check it yourself
Everything here is downstream of a public commit.
Clone it, check out c9a56eb, run the report through the CLI the way the study did.
git clone https://github.com/moment/moment git checkout c9a56ebf5434c2c7b66ae88519cdcfcfeacdf296 npm install CREDDA_PROVIDER=heuristic \ npx tsx apps/cli/src/main.ts fix <repo-path> @<issue-file> --no-color