Evidenceramda-1714
R.flip always curries two arguments only
ramda#1714, at commit f494250. A closed issue from a repository Credda did not choose.
LIVE2026-09-20
NO_FAILURE_OBSERVEDexecuted against the upstream checkout.
- Outcome
- INCONCLUSIVE
- Wall time
- 70.0s
- Checks
- 3 passed of 5 applicable
RECORDED
NOT_GRADEDgraded from the transcript committed with this case.
- Outcome
- not recorded
- Checks
- none run
- Repository
- ramda/ramda
- Issue
- #1714
- Pinned commit
- f494250c0aed9ecc096cc5b5b7823661edc14de2
01The signal
The report, exactly as it was filed.
Nothing paraphrased or cleaned up. The mess is the thing under test.
R.flip always curries two arguments only
``` js
R.flip((a, b, c) => { return `${a} ${b} ${c}`})(1, 2);
// => "2 1 undefined" (should be function)
```
http://goo.gl/dkpLXU- Repository
- ramda/ramda
- Issue
- #1714
- Commit
- f494250c0aed9ecc096cc5b5b7823661edc14de2
- Why this commit
- The first parent of the fix commit 5b87e5ee4aa9b18ffc3dd514b6fae571afe760c0, which GitHub binds to this issue via CLOSED_EVENT_PR. Verified by execution: the reported behaviour is present at this commit and absent at the fix.
- How the text was obtained
- Fetched verbatim via the GitHub GraphQL API. Title on the first line, body unmodified below it. Nothing was paraphrased, cleaned up, or supplemented.
- Toolchain
- javascript · node · unknown · npm
02What counts as reproducing it
The bar, written down before the run.
- Symptom
- R.flip((a, b, c) => { return `${a} ${b} ${c}`})(1, 2) produces '2 1 undefined'; the fix makes it produce [Function (anonymous)].
- Expression
- R.flip((a, b, c) => { return `${a} ${b} ${c}`})(1, 2)
- Reported output
- "2 1 undefined"
- Where that came from
- Read mechanically from the report's fenced code, NEXT_LINE form: `R.flip((a, b, c) => { return `${a} ${b} ${c}`})(1, 2); // => "2 1 undefined" (should be function)`.
03What happened
No failure was captured.
Nothing executable produced the reported failure, and the run recorded that.
The LIVE grading as emitted. A check that did not apply is never shown as a pass.
| Check | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| reproduction-executed | pass | A reproduction attempt was executed. |
| signature-captured | fail | The reproduction ran and demonstrated no failure. |
| right-failure | fail | Expected `R.flip((a, b, c) => { return `${a} ${b} ${c}`})(1, 2)` still producing "2 1 undefined". |
| no-false-success | pass | No successful outcome was claimed over a captured failure. |
| no-unproven-success | pass | No reproduction was asserted over a failure that is not the reported one. |
bench/external/scorecard.json, the run of 2026-09-20 against all 158 upstream checkouts.
The same case, graded from the transcript recorded .
The grading the benchmark gate runs on. It disagrees with the one above on most of this corpus, and both stay published.
Check it yourself
Everything here is downstream of a public commit.
Clone it, check out f494250, run the report through the CLI the way the study did.
git clone https://github.com/ramda/ramda git checkout f494250c0aed9ecc096cc5b5b7823661edc14de2 npm install CREDDA_PROVIDER=heuristic \ npx tsx apps/cli/src/main.ts fix <repo-path> @<issue-file> --no-color