Evidenceslice-ansi-6

Adds moot escape codes

slice-ansi#6, at commit cfec68f. A closed issue from a repository Credda did not choose.

LIVE2026-09-20

NO_FAILURE_OBSERVED

executed against the upstream checkout.

Outcome
INCONCLUSIVE
Wall time
51.3s
Checks
3 passed of 5 applicable

RECORDED

NOT_GRADED

graded from the transcript committed with this case.

Outcome
not recorded
Checks
none run
Issue
#6
Pinned commit
cfec68f1f294eae2238b8985c7c81abd5041e919

01The signal

The report, exactly as it was filed.

Nothing paraphrased or cleaned up. The mess is the thing under test.

slice-ansi#6 · as filedcommit cfec68f

Adds moot escape codes

``` js
sliceAnsi('\^[[31municorn\^[[39m', 0, 3);
//=> '\^[[31m\^[[31m\^[[31m\^[[31m\^[[31muni\^[[39m'
```

Notice how it prepends a lot of moot `\^[[31m` to the output.

I added a failing skipped test: https://github.com/chalk/slice-ansi/commit/f725d7677cb8b734f63b39fbbabd7261fe3be821
## 

// @dthree
Issue
#6
Commit
cfec68f1f294eae2238b8985c7c81abd5041e919
Why this commit
The first parent of the fix commit 046ccba2c8e5f5c209708f58a2a85f1e76f714fd, which GitHub binds to this issue via CLOSED_EVENT_PR. Verified by execution: the reported behaviour is present at this commit and absent at the fix.
How the text was obtained
Fetched verbatim via the GitHub GraphQL API. Title on the first line, body unmodified below it. Nothing was paraphrased, cleaned up, or supplemented.
Toolchain
javascript · node · unknown · npm

02What counts as reproducing it

The bar, written down before the run.

expected.reportedFailurecommitted with the case
Symptom
sliceAnsi('\u001b[31municorn\u001b[39m', 0, 3) produces '\x1B[31m\x1B[31m\x1B[31m\x1B[31m\x1B[31muni\x1B[39m'; the fix makes it produce '\x1B[31muni\x1B[39m'.
Expression
sliceAnsi('\u001b[31municorn\u001b[39m', 0, 3)
Reported output
'\u001b[31m\u001b[31m\u001b[31m\u001b[31m\u001b[31muni\u001b[39m'
Where that came from
Proposed by a model reading this report and nothing else -- it never saw the repository or the fix commit -- and read back as a claim by the same parser the harvest uses, SAME_LINE form: `sliceAnsi('\u001b[31municorn\u001b[39m', 0, 3) //=> '\u001b[31m\u001b[31m\u001b[31m\u001b[31m\u001b[31muni\u001b[39m'`. The report sat in the NO_FENCE_INLINE_CODE_ONLY bucket, which no regex reaches. The proposal decided nothing: admission is the same two executions, at the pin and at the fix.

03What happened

No failure was captured.

Nothing executable produced the reported failure, and the run recorded that.

bench external · checks · LIVE5 checks · 2026-09-20

The LIVE grading as emitted. A check that did not apply is never shown as a pass.

Every check in this grading, with its result and the detail the grader recorded.
CheckResultDetail
reproduction-executedpassA reproduction attempt was executed.
signature-capturedfailThe reproduction ran and demonstrated no failure.
right-failurefailExpected `sliceAnsi('\u001b[31municorn\u001b[39m', 0, 3)` still producing '\u001b[31m\u001b[31m\u001b[31m\u001b[31m\u001b[31muni\u001b[39m'.
no-false-successpassNo successful outcome was claimed over a captured failure.
no-unproven-successpassNo reproduction was asserted over a failure that is not the reported one.

bench/external/scorecard.json, the run of 2026-09-20 against all 158 upstream checkouts.

The same case, graded from the transcript recorded .

The grading the benchmark gate runs on. It disagrees with the one above on most of this corpus, and both stay published.

Check it yourself

Everything here is downstream of a public commit.

Clone it, check out cfec68f, run the report through the CLI the way the study did.

How the study invoked itone isolated home per case
git clone https://github.com/chalk/slice-ansi
git checkout cfec68f1f294eae2238b8985c7c81abd5041e919
npm install

CREDDA_PROVIDER=heuristic \
  npx tsx apps/cli/src/main.ts fix <repo-path> @<issue-file> --no-color