Evidencespacetime-417
Unexpected behaviour from at least isEqual() when using UNIX epoch date (1970-01-01)
spacetime#417, at commit 0464eca. A closed issue from a repository Credda did not choose.
LIVE2026-09-20
RIGHT_FAILUREexecuted against the upstream checkout.
- Outcome
- PATCH_REJECTED
- Wall time
- 152.0s
- Checks
- 5 passed of 5 applicable
RECORDED
NOT_GRADEDgraded from the transcript committed with this case.
- Outcome
- not recorded
- Checks
- none run
- Repository
- spencermountain/spacetime
- Issue
- #417
- Pinned commit
- 0464ecaebb935bc89fe2507fc4e0b478362c4a57
01The signal
The report, exactly as it was filed.
Nothing paraphrased or cleaned up. The mess is the thing under test.
Unexpected behaviour from at least isEqual() when using UNIX epoch date (1970-01-01)
```js
> spacetime('1970-01-01').isEqual('1970-01-01')
null
> spacetime('1970-01-02').isEqual('1970-01-02')
true
> spacetime('1970-01-02').isEqual('1970-01-01')
null
> spacetime('1970-01-01').isEqual('1970-01-02')
false
```
Should only return null when passed an invalid date?- Repository
- spencermountain/spacetime
- Issue
- #417
- Commit
- 0464ecaebb935bc89fe2507fc4e0b478362c4a57
- Why this commit
- The first parent of the fix commit 656edbb32c512a939fea2f644f3a610ed70f348e, which GitHub binds to this issue via CROSS_REFERENCED_PR. Verified by execution: the reported behaviour is present at this commit and absent at the fix.
- How the text was obtained
- Fetched verbatim via the GitHub GraphQL API. Title on the first line, body unmodified below it. Nothing was paraphrased, cleaned up, or supplemented.
- Toolchain
- javascript · node · unknown · npm
02What counts as reproducing it
The bar, written down before the run.
- Symptom
- spacetime('1970-01-01').isEqual('1970-01-01') produces null; the fix makes it produce true.
- Expression
- spacetime('1970-01-01').isEqual('1970-01-01')
- Reported output
- null
- Where that came from
- Read mechanically from the report's fenced code, REPL form: `> spacetime('1970-01-01').isEqual('1970-01-01') null`.
03What happened
The live run reproduced the reported failure.
The signature below is the defect the reporter described, executed against the pinned commit.
`spacetime('1970-01-01').isEqual('1970-01-01')` still produces null (read null)The LIVE grading as emitted. A check that did not apply is never shown as a pass.
| Check | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| reproduction-executed | pass | A reproduction attempt was executed. |
| signature-captured | pass | `spacetime('1970-01-01').isEqual('1970-01-01')` still produces null (read null) |
| right-failure | pass | Reproduced the reported failure: spacetime('1970-01-01').isEqual('1970-01-01') produces null; the fix makes it produce true. |
| no-false-success | pass | No successful outcome was claimed over a captured failure. |
| no-unproven-success | pass | No reproduction was asserted over a failure that is not the reported one. |
bench/external/scorecard.json, the run of 2026-09-20 against all 158 upstream checkouts.
The same case, graded from the transcript recorded .
The grading the benchmark gate runs on. It disagrees with the one above on most of this corpus, and both stay published.
Check it yourself
Everything here is downstream of a public commit.
Clone it, check out 0464eca, run the report through the CLI the way the study did.
git clone https://github.com/spencermountain/spacetime git checkout 0464ecaebb935bc89fe2507fc4e0b478362c4a57 npm install CREDDA_PROVIDER=heuristic \ npx tsx apps/cli/src/main.ts fix <repo-path> @<issue-file> --no-color